Interviewing Vice President Riek Machar while covering the South Sudan referendum for The Washington Post
Rebecca Hamilton is a Professor of Law at American University, Washington College of Law (WCL), where her research and teaching focus on human rights and informational technology, national security law, international law, and criminal law.
A backgrounder on how climate cases came before four international courts, with a summary of issues each court has been asked to address, offers a one-stop resource to refer to as opinions are issued in the weeks and months ahead. Read … Read more >>
The silence emanating from the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, is growing louder by the hour. Three full days after Hamas perpetrated atrocities inside Israel and took civilian hostages into Gaza, Khan has … Read more >>
In its public-facing quarterly financial reports, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, labels all countries in Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East as the “Rest of World.” Although one-third of Facebook’s … Read more >>
B.C. L. Rev (2022). Online intermediaries are omnipresent. Each day, across the globe, the corporations that run these platforms execute policies and practices that serve their profit model, typically by sustaining user engagement. … Read more >>
Harv. Int'l L. J. (2021). Social media platforms are the public square of our era – a reality that has been entrenched by the widespread closure of physical public spaces in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. And this online space is global … Read more >>
Rebecca Hamilton, User-Generated Evidence, Col. J. Transnat'l L. (2018) Around the world, people are using their smartphones to document atrocities. Smartphone apps designed to allow Users to record material that will meet evidentiary … Read more >>
Excerpted from FIGHTING FOR DARFUR. Copyright © 2011.
All rights reserved.
^ Return to Top
Built on the Genesis Framework & WordPress
© 2024 Rebecca Hamilton
Let’s not get played by the “Abdalhaleem tactic”
After the Secretary General’s Nov. 16 report hit the news headlines this week, Sudan Ambassador to the UN, Abdalmahmoud Abdalhaleem, told Reuters: “One big fact should be the focus of the report — that the war is over . . .With peace in sight, the U.N. should, in coordination with the African Union and Sudanese government, plan for an exit strategy.” And with that, the headline ran: Peacekeepers should prepare to leave Darfur: Sudan.
In my view, the ever-blustering Abdalhaleem’s comments should not have been turned into the headline of the article, which otherwise does a good job of covering the Secretary General’s strong report.
You may be thinking, why does she care about a choice of headline? Why does it matter? It matters because Abdalhaleem is a useful compliment to Khartoum’s diplomacy precisely because he goes out and raises the bar on what constitutes “unacceptable” – a tactic that is only successful if the media spotlights him doing it. When the media uses Abdalhaleem’s comments to suggest that the Sudanese government is planning to kick peacekeepers out, suddenly the leadership in Khartoum gets to be “reasonable” by agreeing to let them stay – albeit under conditions that would otherwise be viewed as unacceptable.
Some may argue it’s not the media’s job (let alone an individual headline writer’s job) to be aware of these dynamics. But what is certain is that it is the job of advocates to both notice it and to refuse to buy into it.
Khartoum doesn’t want effective peacekeeping in Darfur – never has, never will. On no measure is this “news” to anyone. International pressure got a handicapped peacekeeping operation in there and, if it is maintained, international pressure will keep them there. Let’s not allow the goalposts to be re-aligned by Abdalhaleem’s comments and start thinking that there is a new fight on the agenda in which a “win” will be keeping these under-resourced, under-trained peacekeepers there under the conditions they are currently operating. The real fight is how to keep them there while increasing their resources and training, and – crucially – changing the political dynamic so they have the leverage to stand up to the government when they need to.